Month: November 2013 (page 1 of 1)

I recently facilitated a workshop on social media for a school. I created two short videos to act as discussion starters, and then I created a workshop structure around the video clips that the school could use to facilitate the discussion with their students.

Outline of a workshop for students on social media:

1. Introduce me (Optional):

   David Wees works with New Visions for Public Schools in the a2i project. He spent the last four years working as a educational technology expert for a school in Vancouver, Canada. One interesting fact about David; he has lived and worked in four different countries. He is going to share some information he has learned about social media with us today, with video two short videos he created.

    

2. Show the clip titled: “Social Media Part 1”
   (Optional: Start with students sharing out what they know about the Internet and social media first)

    

3. Discussion (have students work in groups of 3 or 4 students) – 5 minutes or so

   Some possible questions:

   Print the following questions for students to talk about (add more questions as you see fit)

   What kinds of things have I posted online?
   Who can access these things?
   What can I do to limit access to things I post online?
   What could happen to me if I post things online?

    

4. Whole group discussion (5 minutes or so)

   Have different groups share out points from their discussion.

    

5. Show the clip titled: “Social Media Part 2”

    

6. Discussion (have students work in groups of 3 or 4 students) – 5 minutes or so

   What is in my digital footprint?
   What can I do to build a stronger, more positive digital footprint for the future?
   What kinds of things should I avoid doing?
   What kinds of things should I make sure I do?

    

7. Whole group discussion (5 minutes or so)

   Some possible questions:
   (Recommended: Make a chart for the whole room to see of the positive and negative things about sharing stuff online)

   What are some positive things we can share?
   What are the some of the negative things we should avoid sharing?
   What can we do if we find out someone else is sharing negative stuff about us?
   What is the relationship between what we share, and what people think of us?

    

8. Exit slip:

   Have students write down three things they learned from the workshop today. Read what they wrote and use it to inform a future follow-up session on social media.

*Note that I have very much simplified the “how the Internet works” portion of the video as my aim is to get kids talking about it rather than knowing all of the technical details.

As I watched my son over the past few days learn about shape, I am struck by not only how much we need to learn to make sense of the world, but also by how even simple things cannot be taken granted as known by children.

My youngest son, who is about 20 months old now, is learning how to take a small piece of yellow plastic that forms a shape (an oval, a circle, a hexagon, and 4 other shapes) and push it through a hole that is only slightly larger than the shape he is pushing through it. The task requires him to pay close attention to both the shape he has in his hand, the orientation of that shape, and the hole he is trying to force it through.

At first he pretty much chooses shapes at random, and tries to jam into the hole. Eventually he finds a match and gets a shape through the hole, or he gives up. He rarely turns the shape in his hand, or the container the shape goes into.

Eventually he learns that he has to often rotate the shape in his hand, and so he picks up a random shape and tries to shove it in a random hole, and when it doesn’t work the first time, he says, “No…no…no,” and rotates the shape a bit to try again.

Soon he has made a few matches, and is always able to easily find the right hole for the circular shape and the oval shape, and soon after the plus sign shape. For all of the other shapes, he continues to try to randomly match shapes to holes. He looks at the shape to identify it as one of the ones he knows, but he does not seem to connect the general idea that the shape he sees in the piece should match the shape he sees in the hole.

The next day, I am surprised to discover that he can match almost all of the shapes, and frequently looks at the shape to see which one he has, and then which hole he should put the shape in. He often rotates the shape several times when he is sure he has the right hole. When he is not sure, he tends to give up quickly and go back to a shape with which he is very familiar.

In a few days, he goes from basically using a random matching strategy to carefully looking at the shape in order to be able to match it. At this stage the only shapes that stump him regularly are the regular pentagon, and the regular hexagon. 

I notice however that his ability to do other puzzles does not seem noticeably improved. It’s like his learning is restricted to this one very narrow context, and within this narrow context, he has either just learned to match each of the individual patterns or possibly he recognizes a small generalization; for this puzzle the shape should match the hole. As the months progress, I will continue to watch how his understanding of shape grows and develops.

It is fascinating to me to see that shape is a learned concept and that even what seem like simple generalizations are learned. It makes me wonder what concepts my students may not have fully developed, even by the time they arrived to me in high school.

I’m currently working on creating a sample sequence of lessons for teachers to use for a geometry unit. At this stage, students will have been exposed to (but will not necessarily have learned all of) geometric transformations, constructions, and some review on geometric vocabulary.

My objective is to create a sequence of lessons which include:

• embedded formative assessment,
• opportunities for students to discuss student thinking,
• opportunities for students to make sense of the idea of proof,
• opportunities for students to prove geometric proofs,
• opportunities for students to engage in mathematical inquiry,
• engaging tasks that help get kids excited about mathematical arguments.

The last time I taught geometry, I think I maybe managed to to hit 1 or 2 points from this list, so I have given myself a tall challenge. I need help.

One of my university professors once told me, “Something is proven true when everyone stops arguing that it isn’t” so with that in mind, here is a vague idea that I am considering and need help fleshing out:

Basically, students would spend their time during this unit making interesting geometric observations and then attempting to prove to each other that these arguments are true. Part of their time would be exploring geometric objects, possibly through constructions and possibly through looking at (interactive?) diagrams. During this time, when they see something that they think might be true, they create a proof (in everyday language that they understand) that it is true, and then they present their argument, either in small groups or to the whole class.

Here is an example from my imagination. Suppose students have access to this online geometric construction tool (or lots of paper, a compass, and a straight edge) and when playing around, one of them creates this construction.

Student 1: “Oh wow, that’s pretty cool. I made a regular hexagon.”
Student 2: “It sure looks like a hexagon, but remember what Mr. Wees said? It might be just really close to a regular hexagon. How do we know for sure it is one?”
Student 1: “Hrmm. A regular hexagon has all the sides the same length, and this looks like all the sides are the same length, so it must be a hexagon.”
Student 3: “How do you know for sure the sides are all the same length?”
Student 4: “Yah, maybe they are like, one or two pixels off or something.”
Student 2: “How did you draw this? Can you show me how?”
Student 1 shows her group members how she came up with the construction. “See, it’s a regular hexagon.”
Student 3: “I notice that when you made each of the sides you used a circle.”
Student 4: “Yeah, I noticed that too.”
Student 2: “And all of the circles you used were the same size.”
Student 4: “Well, not all of them. There are bigger and smaller circles.”
Student 2: “Okay well all of the smaller circles are the same size.”
Student 1: “How do you know that?”
Student 2: “They all have the same radius, see? These two circles have the same radius, and these two, and these two. They are all connected so they all have the same radius.”
Student 4: “Ooooh, I have an idea…”
Student 1: “Me too! Those radiuses that he pointed out are the same as the lengths of the sides of the hexagon so if they are all the same, then all of the sides of the hexagon are the same size. Done!”
Student 3: “Is it possible to make a hexagon where all the sides are the same length, but the hexagon is still not a regular hexagon?”

 

Obviously this is an idealized situation, and maybe a bit unrealistic but this is where I would like students to end up. What kinds of classroom conditions would lead to students being able to do this? How would the class be structured? What kinds of supports would a teacher have to give to help support students?

Why do we teach math?

(Image source)

It could be because the mathematical procedures that are taught in schools will be useful to students later, but I am pretty sure this is false. Almost everyone forgets those procedures as they get older because most people in our society use virtually none of the procedures they learned in school in their day-to-day life. Obviously there are engineers, mathematicians, and scientists who use the mathematics they have learned, possibly on a daily basis, but I think if you dig deeper into the work they do, many of these people use tools to help to do their work (like Mathematica, for example), look up the finer details of mathematical procedures that they do not use often, or who use only a very specialized portion of their mathematical knowledge regularly.

It could be that we want to expose students to different ways of thinking about the world. In this case we would be less concerned with the exact set of mathematical procedures they have learned, and more concerned with learning mathematics as a way of thinking and knowing. I see little evidence that this is an explicit goal of mathematics instruction given that; the students are assessed only on the procedures, teachers are assessed on their students understandings of those procedures, and that the set of mathematical procedures we want students to know is so prescribed such that it is virtually identical around the world.

It could be that we would like students to learn transferable problem solving skills. In this case, we want to teach mathematics in such a way as to promote the likelihood that students will be able to transfer what they learn to other areas. Cross-disciplinary study would be the norm, rather than the exception. It turns out that “teaching skills that transfer” is not as simple as one thinks. In fact, my understanding is that most of the times when people learn skills in one context, they do not end up transfering those skills to other contexts. Instruction that aims for transferable skills has to provide opportunities for students to make connections between different areas, reflect on what they have learned, and develop metacognitive strategies so that students think about their thinking. What evidence is there that these types of activities are a regular part of math classes?

It could be that we would like students to see the beauty and elegance of mathematics. One way to do this could be through exploring mathematical art. Another might be to look at some famous examples of truly elegant uses of mathematics. We could also ask students to talk about mathematics in the abstract and come to a shared understanding of what elegance and beauty in mathematics mean. As far as I know, none of these activities is a common one in math classes. It is depressing to me that this way of thinking which has so much beauty in it is shared in such a way that almost no one in our society ever gets to experience beautiful mathematics.

If one or more of the reasons I suggested above is something you think is a good reason to teach mathematics, how are you ensuring that you meet this goal with what happens for students in your classroom? 

What other reasons are there to teach mathematics?