I’m participating in Dr. Jo Boaler’s course "How to learn mathematics" which started two days ago. Here are my observations so far:
- I like the structure of the ideas Dr. Boaler has presented so far. The "quizzes" we have done so far seem not to have right answers, and are more designed to make us think. The videos are short and engaging and easy to follow.
- The premise of the course is excellent, and I think that this kind of course is best held in a discussion style, with some ideas being seeded by the instructor, which looks like the purpose so far of the course.
- I read every single introduction people posted, and I was very impressed with people’s willingness to share that they have had poor experiences in math. I know that happens quite a bit (almost everyone I meet tells me they were terrible in math after I tell them what I do), but not so often in print, and I suspect not so often on the first day of a course. This almost certainly has something to do with the way Dr. Boaler framed the course which has clearly made people willing to start the course by candidly sharing their experiences.
- Unfortunately, the user interface for discussion is awful, which I know has nothing to do with Dr. Boaler, since she is very likely constrained in what platform she uses (given that she works at Stanford). This is also an issue that I brought up with respect to Dr. Keith Devlin’s course on Mathematical Reasoning.
Once I participate in a conversation, I can see no way of finding out if anyone has responded to my conversation without looking up the conversation in the long, long, long list of other conversations that have happened. I have no "home base" with which to find conversations for later. I actually used CTRL + F to search for my name after loading the very long welcome thread to find my name! My first recommendation for improving this is that the designers of Stanford’s course software should look at other forum software, much of which has evolved over at least a decade of use, and not try to recreate a new user interface for a standard forum discussion. My next recommendation is to offer a way for users to see, in one place, who has responded to something they have posted, and to be able to choose to receive notifications when someone responds. The discussion space should be more like Facebook, and less like Moodle.
Another issue I have noticed is that I seem to have to scroll through the conversations and load them as I scroll. This means that if I am interested in finding an older conversation, I may potentially have to spend many minutes scrolling through unwanted conversations looking for the one I want.
This issue around the usability of the discussion space is an important one, but this course is very interesting to me, and I intend to work with the discussion space as offered.
Micah S says:
I’m finding the course a bit empty of data and actual classroom practice, and I wish the readings were more substantial (only one in the first unit?!). Too much telling, too little showing.
But I completely agree with you about the interface. The Coursera forums are a bit better organized (discussions organized into visible sub-forums, tagging available) and it makes a world of difference. There are some things you can do to make EdX discussions a little more user-friendly:
☑ Click on the starred corner at the upper-right of a discussion to “follow” it. Then you can click on “Show All Discussions” to filter by the discussions that you have followed.
☑ When you click on somebody’s name, it will take you to a “profile” (not really) page with a list of all discussions they have started and participated in. This is useful both for following the discussions of other people of interest, as well as your own. I’ve bookmarked in my browser the profiles I’m interested in following.
☑ My biggest beef with the discussion is that there is no conversation so far, the discussion boards are just thousands of people posting stream-of-conscious answers to the video prompts. To combat this, I started a page on the wiki to list study groups where people can have more focused conversations and collaboration. So far it hasn’t attracted a lot of attention because the interface of the wiki is also very poor 🙁
Hoping this course gets better.
July 17, 2013 — 3:26 am
Al Gonzalez says:
I’ve been enjoying and appreciating the course content so far but agree that discussion has been impossible. I’ve been mainly working on it solo.
July 17, 2013 — 4:14 am
Sarah, Maths Feedback says:
I agree, David, about the great things we have been learning so far. I have finished one session so far and found that the interspersed tasks have been useful.
I agree with Micah that I am looking forward and hoping for more readings.
And I look forward to hearing what else you both think as the course progresses!
July 17, 2013 — 5:05 am
Sue Jones says:
I agree, completely. I am not sure how this would be managed with the numbers of participants, but I feel very much like a little piece of kelp in the ocean. I am *really* appreciating the amount of time dedicating to putting this together, and its thoroughness and scholarship. It is far removed from “hey! Here are some (crappy-quality) videos of me talking about something that I know everything about!” that are entirely too commonplace online.
I’m really glad that we’ve got four-day work weeks for a spell so I can dive in more thoroughly on Friday… the interface makes it easy to plow through the content, but makes it hard to connect and collaborate.
July 17, 2013 — 2:36 pm
Sue Jones says:
I made a comment that I wanted to edit … and five minutes later couldn’t find it. Fortunately I remembered it had the word “trauma” in it so I used the search feature to find it.
It’s still *really* tedious to click “more” and wait…. and wait… and my computer is *reasonably* fast (but it’s time to reboot it ;))
July 17, 2013 — 2:37 pm
Henry Klatt says:
Children should be taught math in such a way that the children may find serious interest in it. I have seen many Childs fear this subject.
click here
July 25, 2013 — 12:33 am