Education ∪ Math ∪ Technology

Create a brick and mortar university where every course is open

What would a university look like where every course was open and accessible to any interested student?

The whole reason we’d use a brick and mortar institution is to attempt to preserve as much of the structures of universities which are vital, in my opinion, to their position in our democracies. For example, I see universities as places where people with very different ideologies meet (and often conflict) and in online institutions, I think differing world views are quite often siloed from each other.

Imagine a place where students could drop in and attend lectures, learn how to use lab equipment, and access learning materials on demand, rather than on the administrative schedule of the university. Students would pay a flat fee to attend the university, rather than paying per course. The onus would be on the student to attend classes, and as many of them as they like, and as often as they like.

Students could meet with faculty advisors who could help them chart a course through the university. They could submit assignments to an assessment centre (digitally) which could give them feedback on their thinking. Students could use the information given to them by the assessment centres to guide their learning. As the students submit assignments and demonstrate mastery of concepts or skills, they could receive digital badges indicating mastery in a certain area. Collect enough badges, and you get certification. Collect more, and you get the equivalent of a degree. If a student failed to complete a degree, they could likely still demonstrate mastery of a subset of concepts.

The pace through the university could be self-directed by the student. Instead of focusing on the “four year degree,” students could focus on mastery learning, and emerge from the university based on how much they’ve accomplished, rather than how long they’ve attended.

Students could move from a course which is too difficult for them to one that is more appropriate to their background without the expensive surcharges many universities use to discourage this practice. Courses could be structured to open on continuously enrollment, and given a large enough campus, Calculus 100 could start fresh every week. If a student attempts week 1 of Calculus 100 and doesn’t get it, they could try it again, perhaps with a different instructor, or with more support, instead of having to wait until the end of the semester to restart the course.

Students could also collaborate with other students on projects, and when important enough, take breaks from their studies to complete their work. Universities could continue to be places to do the important networking and collaborative knowledge building that they have always been an important aspect of their role in society.

Students could transfer between similar university systems using their badges as evidence of learning, rather than transcripts. Essentially, their assessments of their learning would be their transcripts rather than uncertain standards between different instructors.

While there are obviously some issues with this idea (I can think of a half-dozen objections to it off the top of my head), I’d be interested to hear how we could extend it.

4 Comments

Add yours →

  1. Anonymous says:

    Count me in. This is a good model for “flipping”. Don’t have lectures as such, use online presentations and the students attend “class” for clarification and assistance.

    • David Wees says:

      I wonder if you could be subversive and start doing this on the "down low" in a regular university? Could you find enough professors, grad students, and undergraduates willing to invest time into constructing a parallel university?

  2. Anonymous says:

    I am attending an online university at the moment. Even though I am in a degree program, I have a fair amount of flexibility in what I take. Courses start every Monday. I don’t have professors as much as mentors who (attempt) to guide me or help me with MY learning. If I am not showing mastery of the various skills I need to develop, the mentors provide extra resources and feedback on how I can develop that mastery. However, I really like the idea of earning badges to demonstrate which skills have been learned and having the flexibility to transfer those from institution to institution. I’d love to develop something like this in secondary school as well.

    • David Wees says:

      Mentors are, I think, key to the success of any school. The mentor-mentee relationship in the gigantic classes at universities is disfunctional, although there is a certain amount of peer mentoring which naturally immerges in any classroom. So I’d certainly want to find a way to build mentoring into the school I’m describing.

      I wonder, could students work on long-term projects in teams, while learning course material that helps them complete their projects? I could imagine this being a fantastic model of instruction in an engineering school, for example, or in any discipline which regularly creates collaborative projects. Each project could have an experienced (or "graduate") student who leads the team, acting as mentor for the others in the group.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enter in the following *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.