Some highlights from the video above (thanks to @smartinez for sharing it):
- Hardly anyone who teaches actually applies the scientific method to their teaching.
- Most students are stuck on the Aristolian perspective of how physics works, learning real physics is incredibly difficult.
- Disagrees strongly with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
- Our old theories of learning haven’t been updated in 50 years. "We just accept them."
- Lecture is the default teaching method at universities.
- If you are going to do lecture, at least do it right. Increase the scale of the lecture, improve the skill of the lecturer. At least do it right.
- If you have respect for the lecturer, your attention goes up, and your retention of what they say increases.
- Hundreds of thousands of kids go through awful lectures each year.
- Teachers ask too many pseudorhetorical questions, don’t give students enough time to respond, and students only ask an average of 2 questions a year.
- Socrates often bullied his students into accepting his view of the world so the Socratic method is not all it is cracked up to be.
- Lecture comes from "to read" as in reading a sacred text. "Preaching instead of teaching."
- Feynman discovered that in Brazil students could learn from the book, but knew no physics. "Teaching through lectures is a hopeless task." ~ Feynman
- "Data is not the plural of anecdote." ~ Eric Mazur
- "Lecture is the transfer of the notes of the lecturer to the notebook of the student without passing through either." ~ Eric Mazur
- Give the students the notes in advance. Seating arrangement matters. Lead your lectures through questions. Use feedback from your class to determine which way to go ahead. If majority of students are incorrect, have them discuss the ideas with each other.
- "I’m just going to give it to you once, you have to get it right the first time." Lectures should be recorded since students will need multiple times to learn it.
- What’s the point in recording lectures that were bad in the first place? Make sure the lectures are good.
- Attendance at lectures is horrible.
- Why don’t we worry about students not attending lectures? Why aren’t we doing something about it?
- 25 minutes tops for attention span.
Here are ten fairly good points from his talk:
- Why are lectures 1 hour long?
We based the length of lectures on scheduling, rather than on the attention span of the learner. 1 hour is itself based on the Babylonian time-system, and is extremely arbitrary as a result.
- Tyranny of time
We have lots of ways of sharing our lectures whenever students want to access them, why do we force them to access them one time from a lecture hall?
- Tyranny of location
Why do force people to attend something in person when they can’t interact anyway? If students could be involved in the discussion, then having them physically present makes sense, but otherwise, there is no particular reason they should have to come to the lecture hall itself.
- Psychological attention span
People can’t focus for very long, particularly after a few days of lectures. We subject learners to class after class after class, when in fact their attention span cannot handle that much information to process.
- Cognitive overload
Lecture crams too much information into a small amount of time. Students are forced to handle more information than they can handle, which is absolutely debilitating for learning.
- Episodic and semantic memory
The mind doesn’t cope very well with the mixture of semantic (the processing of the content of the lecture) and episodic (from the processing of the visual) information you are receiving.
- Learn by doing
Nothing in lecture gives students opportunity to engage with the material themselves. People learn loads from actually applying their knowledge.
- Spaced practice
People need repeated practice over time, rather than one-off lectures. Lectures tend to give information and assume the learner will go and practice the information themselves, rather than allowing time for the learner to practice using the new knowledge immediately.
- Not collaborative
Lecture isn’t at all collaborative. It’s probably not intended to be, but collaboration is an extremely effective way to learn, given the feedback you receive from your peers.
- Personality problems
Teaching should not be the secondary job of a researcher. This is not a problem experienced in most K to 12 institutions, but is a serious problem at higher levels of education.
These are some pretty serious problems. What could you do to modify your practice? Should you lecture for an hour? I don’t think so. Instead, I recommend that you cut your lecture to only 10 minutes, on a small amount of material, and then give your students time to practice and engage with the material immediately.
Gino Bondi says:
Nice post, David
A lot of great points but I’m going to focus on bullets 15 and 16 because they have a huge impact for our high schools (particularly when you hear the mantra that “it’s not about technology”).
“Give the students the notes in advance. Seating arrangement matters. Lead your lectures through questions. Use feedback from your class to determine which way to go ahead. If majority of students are incorrect, have them discuss the ideas with each other.”
Wouldn’t this be an ideal approach for all classes? Everyone “initiating” a discussion from the same knowledge based starting point. Feedback as a means for establishing the direction that the class/course takes (not solely curriculum driven but contextually as well based on the needs of the respective students). Having students collaborating with each other and sharing expertise while the teacher circulates to gauge understanding and through this, begins to conceptualize “seating arrangements” (because they do matter) for the next class – physical organization that could help facilitate a smoother delivery of differentiated instruction. Notice: no discussion about technology whatsoever, just a focus on optimizing the learning experience.
“I’m just going to give it to you once, you have to get it right the first time.” Lectures should be recorded since students will need multiple times to learn it.”
This one is a “no-brainer” Two years ago, at our Student Forum, our students informed us that they needed and wanted more time to “get it.” As a staff, we realized that time was an issue and set up after school programs as well as Night School support classes for our students. However, what many teachers are now doing is posting class notes on Moodle, their blogs and also podcasting lectures. The podcasting, in my mind, holds the biggest impact in that what we are doing is reversing the delivery model. Students’ homework is to watch the lesson (for as long as they need and wherever they want over the two days prior to class). Now, for instance in Chemistry, they enter class and initiate the lab immediately. Those who are having difficulty with the podcasted material come together for a teacher lead seminar. Take away the technology of the podcast, at minimum, let students take out their iPods, phones, place them on the their desks and record the lecture as well as the questions which arise.
I’l be sharing your Points #1-10 with my staff at our next collaborative planning day.
Thanks for sharing
May 17, 2011 — 1:28 pm